
Inside information
Millions of admissions data points, alongside academic expertise.

For students, and the people who guide them.
We study university admissions in depth, then turn the evidence into practical tools.


Why this work matters
Choosing five UCAS options can feel daunting. Understanding how an application will be assessed is harder still.
We examine what happens beyond submission, with particular depth in Oxford and Cambridge admissions, and put that understanding within reach of every student, teacher and adviser who needs it.
We are researchers, academics, analysts and advisers.
Our research
Our work draws on hundreds of thousands of historical admissions outcomes, institutional evidence and academic expertise.
Developed with Oxford and Cambridge professors, admissions tutors and advisers, our framework turns scattered information into a clearer understanding of what matters for an application.

Millions of admissions data points, alongside academic expertise.

Careful statistical analysis, informed by academic judgement, with the limits of the evidence made clear.

Tools and briefings that help students choose well, prepare effectively and make informed decisions.
The evidence
Requirements vary between courses, and admissions practices change.
Economics and Management, Computer Science and Law: applicants for each place, 2023–2025, from Oxford's admissions report for 2026, Table 1.2.
History and Music: approximate, worked out from the rounded success rates on Oxford's course pages for the same years.
Each is a ratio for a whole course, never one applicant's chance.
Applicants per place · 2023–2025



Courses, universities and colleges are counted from HESA’s Discover Uni dataset, release of 8 September 2026. Estimates are counted from Delta Academics in October 2026. HESA’s data is used under CC BY 4.0.
For students
From your five UCAS choices to your personal statement, Delta makes the evidence relevant to your application.
Ambition
For each UCAS choice, Delta shows the whole range of grades held by the students who started the course, where that is published, never an average alone, and says where a student’s predicted grades sit within it.
A 2023 study of 70,000 applicants in the United States found that a widely used tool, showing students the grades of past admitted applicants from their school, increased undermatching (applying only where a student was overqualified) by more than half among 17,000 high achievers. Delta is built the other way.
Tomkins, Grossman, Page and Goel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023

For schools and advisers
We give university guidance counsellors and teachers the research and tools to advise with confidence, from an individual conversation to a whole year group.
Bring evidence to the conversation
Recognise potential and explore possibilities that might otherwise be overlooked.
Support a balanced discussion of ambition, suitability and application risk.
See where students need support and make the most of the time available.
Delta Briefings
From research to practice
Talk to us about the research, or about Delta for your school.